gives more insight on the user. From this, it can be concluded that the user was a media activist with a group called X for a year. This adds to his credibility as he most likely has knowledge of the issues he is posting about. However, this can also make him come across as biased, as activists usually work towards achieving a certain goal. Blog: The blog of the uploader also writes about similar issues as the other accounts. Therefore, it adds to the credibility of knowledge of the user and his possible bias. Conclusion: From the information collected, it can be interpreted that the account has a certain degree of credibility. The videos of the account do not have many views, and there are only seven of them. However, the topics of the content posted are all similar. Additionally, other accounts the user has created shed more light on who they are. It was found that the individual was a media activist, which adds to his credibility. It should be noted, however, that because of this, the user might be slightly biased. Additionally, care should be taken to ensure that conclusions are not drawn too quickly; for instance, the full event may not be depicted in order to present a certain narrative. Ultimately, this means that analysis of the content itself should determine whether the content is verified or not. 2.2 Step 2: Events and People Depicted The video depicts a protest by civilians and a response to it by municipal police forces who are using riot shields and police batons. On the riot shields, a logo and the text “Guarda Municipal” and “Rio” can be found. The logo and the text suggest that the authority acting here is the Guarda Municipal of Rio de Janeiro, which was confirmed by a Google search of the equipment and logo of the Guarda Municipal of Rio de Janeiro. 71