proved very hard to definitively debunk.
Pre-existing images that have been misattributed (perhaps the most common form of
“fake”) can often be debunked in a few seconds
through a reverse image search. And pictures of
major events can often be at least partly verified
by finding mutually confirmatory images from
multiple sources.
But neither of those work for a one-off chance
sighting that’s either an original picture or an
original hoax. (My experience is that verification of images that can’t be debunked/verified
within a few minutes tends to take a lot longer.)
In the end, sometimes there’s no substitute for the time-consuming brute force approach of
image verification: tracing an image’s spread back through social media to uncover the original; walking the streets of Google Street View to pinpoint a rough location; and/or scrolling
through pages of Google Image results for a particular keyword, looking for possible source
images.
In this case, the Google Image search approach paid off - we were able to find the exact im45
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents