This Handbook discourages lay individuals that act in their personal capacity
and are without the support of a network or organization from engaging in
information-gathering exercises for safety reasons, not only concerning their
own safety but also that of those they engage with (victims, witnesses).
1.4
Terminology
The Handbook’s terminology is the result of careful choices by the
authors based on extensive consultations with a variety of stakeholders and
experts in the fields of accountability, investigations and documentation of
serious human rights violations.
1.4.1 Investigation and Documentation
Talking of “investigation by civil society actors” can both be
misleading and controversial. The term “investigation” convenes the idea of
an activity that only highly skilled and trained professionals are equipped to
carry out. Furthermore, criminal investigations are subjected to legal and
procedural standards that fall well beyond what this Handbook can and aims
to accomplish. The use of the word intends to neither mislead nor
exacerbate the controversy. While only professionally trained experts acting
in their official capacity can carry out “formal investigations” for the
purposes of criminal accountability, abiding by criminal investigative
standards has the potential to maximize the reliability and possible use of the
information collected. However, the weight and role of this information
within the criminal process itself is a matter of judicial decision only, and
following this Handbook’s standards will not guarantee the admissibility of
information as “evidence” in trials.
The collection of information by high evidentiary standards can
strengthen the overall process of documenting serious human rights
violations by enhancing the quality of the information collected, and
expanding the possibilities to use this information in and beyond the
criminal process. Furthermore, there is a disconnect between the way the
word “investigation” is (and should be) used by the highly trained
community of official legal and investigative authorities and the way it is
used by the audience for which this Handbook was written. The term
“investigation” is therefore used purposefully to adapt to the language used
by the audience the Handbook intends to reach, while making explicit that it
15