2. MONITORING AND DOCUMENTING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS: SOME BASIC CONCEPTS
ACT AGAINST VICTIM + INVOLVEMENT OF PERPETRATOR =
WHO DID WHAT TO WHOM
Just as there are different types of acts, there are different levels of involvement by
perpetrators.
Definition
Involvement is the participation of a perpetrator in a particular act, whether as
one who directly committed it, or otherwise.
For instance, in the case of violent or coercive acts, involvement by perpetrators can be in
terms of any of the following:
directly carried out the act
gave orders that led to the act
was a passive accomplice in the act
is confirmed to be present in the execution of the act
planned the act
is suspected of involvement in the act
2.7 WHAT ACTIONS WERE TAKEN IN RESPONSE AND WHO DID WHAT?
Information relevant to these questions will be concerned with the following concepts:
[provision of] information, intervention, source and intervening party.
Information and Intervention
There are some processes or actions that are not necessarily intrinsic parts of an event, but are
taken usually in response to it, and that are also deemed relevant in the “events” methodology.
These are provision of information (or simply, information) and intervention.
Definition
Provision of information, or simply information, is the provision by a source,
to the fact-finder, of data about an event, a victim, or a perpetrator.
There can be conflicting information from various sources, and it is the task of the fact-finder
to evaluate the information and assess its reliability.
Definition
An intervention is any action by a party designed to change the course of an
event or the status of those involved in the event, especially in terms of assistance. It can be for
instance, the examination of a victim to seek marks of torture, or the dissemination of a press
release to denounce a massacre.
12
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents